2000-06-02 21:42:36 +08:00
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
|
|
BIRD Programmer's Guide: Protocols
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) 2000 Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>
|
|
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
|
2000-06-03 01:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
<sect>Routing protocols
|
2000-06-02 21:42:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2000-06-03 01:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
<sect1>Introduction
|
2000-06-02 21:42:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The routing protocols are the BIRD's heart and a fine amount of code
|
|
|
|
is dedicated to their management and for providing support functions to them.
|
|
|
|
(-: Actually, this is the reason why the directory with sources of the core
|
|
|
|
code is called <tt/nest/ :-).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>When talking about protocols, one need to distinguish between <em/protocols/
|
|
|
|
and protocol <em/instances/. A protocol exists exactly once, not depending on whether
|
|
|
|
it's configured on not and it can have an arbitrary number of instances corresponding
|
|
|
|
to its "incarnations" requested by the configuration file. Each instance is completely
|
|
|
|
autonomous, has its own configuration, its own status, its own set of routes and its
|
|
|
|
own set of interfaces it works on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>A protocol is represented by a <struct/protocol/ structure containing all the basic
|
|
|
|
information (protocol name, default settings and pointers to most of the protocol
|
|
|
|
hooks). All these structures are linked in the <param/protocol_list/ list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Each instance has its own <struct/proto/ structure describing all its properties: protocol
|
|
|
|
type, configuration, a resource pool where all resources belonging to the instance
|
|
|
|
live, various protocol attributes (take a look at the declaration of <struct/proto/ in
|
|
|
|
<tt/protocol.h/), protocol states (see below for what do they mean), connections
|
|
|
|
to routing tables, filters attached to the protocol
|
|
|
|
and finally a set of pointers to the rest of protocol hooks (they
|
|
|
|
are the same for all instances of the protocol, but in order to avoid extra
|
|
|
|
indirections when calling the hooks from the fast path, they are stored directly
|
|
|
|
in <struct/proto/). The instance is always linked in both the global instance list
|
|
|
|
(<param/proto_list/) and a per-status list (either <param/active_proto_list/ for
|
|
|
|
running protocols, <param/initial_proto_list/ for protocols being initialized or
|
|
|
|
<param/flush_proto_list/ when the protocol is being shut down).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The protocol hooks are described in the next chapter, for more information about
|
|
|
|
configuration of protocols, please refer to the configuration chapter and also
|
|
|
|
to the description of the <func/proto_commit/ function.
|
|
|
|
|
2000-06-03 01:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
<sect1>Protocol states
|
2000-06-02 21:42:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>As startup and shutdown of each protocol are complex processes which can be affected
|
|
|
|
by lots of external events (user's actions, reconfigurations, behaviour of neighboring routers etc.),
|
|
|
|
we have decided to supervise them by a pair of simple state machines -- the protocol
|
|
|
|
state machine and a core state machine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The <em/protocol state machine/ corresponds to internal state of the protocol
|
|
|
|
and the protocol can alter its state whenever it wants to. There exist
|
|
|
|
the following states:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<descrip>
|
|
|
|
<tag/PS_DOWN/ The protocol is down and waits for being woken up by calling its
|
|
|
|
start() hook.
|
|
|
|
<tag/PS_START/ The protocol is waiting for connection with the rest of the
|
|
|
|
network. It's active, it has resources allocated, but it still doesn't want
|
|
|
|
any routes since it doesn't know what to do with them.
|
|
|
|
<tag/PS_UP/ The protocol is up and running. It communicates with the core,
|
|
|
|
delivers routes to tables and wants to hear announcement about route changes.
|
|
|
|
<tag/PS_STOP/ The protocol has been shut down (either by being asked by the
|
|
|
|
core code to do so or due to having encountered a protocol error).
|
|
|
|
</descrip>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Unless the protocol is in the <tt/PS_DOWN/ state, it can decide to change
|
|
|
|
its state by calling the <func/proto_notify_state/ function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>At any time, the core code can ask the protocol to shut down by calling its stop() hook.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The <em/core state machine/ takes care of the core view of protocol state.
|
|
|
|
The states are traversed according to changes of the protocol state machine, but
|
|
|
|
sometimes the transitions are delayed if the core needs to finish some actions
|
|
|
|
(for example sending of new routes to the protocol) before proceeding to the
|
|
|
|
new state. There exist the following core states:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<descrip>
|
|
|
|
<tag/FS_HUNGRY/ The protocol is down, it doesn't have any routes and
|
|
|
|
doesn't want them.
|
|
|
|
<tag/FS_FEEDING/ The protocol has reached the <tt/PS_UP/ state, but
|
|
|
|
we are still busy sending the initial set of routes to it.
|
|
|
|
<tag/FS_HAPPY/ The protocol is up and has complete routing information.
|
|
|
|
<tag/FS_FLUSHING/ The protocol is shutting down (it's in either <tt/PS_STOP/
|
|
|
|
or <tt/PS_DOWN/ state) and we're flushing all of its routes from the
|
|
|
|
routing tables.
|
|
|
|
</descrip>
|
|
|
|
|
2000-06-03 01:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
<sect1>Functions of the protocol module
|
2000-06-02 21:42:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The protocol module provides the following functions:
|