Don't segfault on unknown interface.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d36d838df5
commit
29df5739c4
1 changed files with 21 additions and 12 deletions
|
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ rip_reply(struct proto *p)
|
|||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define P_NAME "rip/unknown" /* FIXME */
|
||||
#define P_NAME p->name
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Output processing
|
||||
|
@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ rip_tx( sock *s )
|
|||
packet->block[i].tag = htons( 0 ); /* FIXME: What should I set it to? */
|
||||
packet->block[i].network = e->n.prefix;
|
||||
packet->block[i].netmask = ipa_mkmask( e->n.pxlen );
|
||||
packet->block[i].nexthop = IPA_NONE; /* FIXME: How should I set it? */
|
||||
packet->block[i].metric = htonl( 1+ (e->metric?:1) );
|
||||
packet->block[i].nexthop = IPA_NONE; /* FIXME: How should I set it? My own IP address? */
|
||||
packet->block[i].metric = htonl( 1+ (e->metric?:1) ); /* FIXME: is this right? I already ++ metric at input side */
|
||||
if (ipa_equal(e->whotoldme, s->daddr)) {
|
||||
DBG( "(split horizont)" );
|
||||
/* FIXME: should we do it in all cases? */
|
||||
|
@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ rip_sendto( struct proto *p, ip_addr daddr, int dport, struct rip_interface *rif
|
|||
rip_tx(c->rif->sock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct rip_interface*
|
||||
static struct rip_interface*
|
||||
find_interface(struct proto *p, struct iface *what)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rip_interface *i;
|
||||
|
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ advertise_entry( struct proto *p, struct rip_block *b, ip_addr whotoldme )
|
|||
rte *r;
|
||||
net *n;
|
||||
neighbor *neighbor;
|
||||
struct rip_interface *i;
|
||||
struct rip_interface *rif;
|
||||
|
||||
bzero(&A, sizeof(A));
|
||||
A.proto = p;
|
||||
|
@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ advertise_entry( struct proto *p, struct rip_block *b, ip_addr whotoldme )
|
|||
A.flags = 0;
|
||||
A.gw = ipa_nonzero(b->nexthop) ? b->nexthop : whotoldme;
|
||||
A.from = whotoldme;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* FIXME: Check if destination looks valid - ie not net 0 or 127 */
|
||||
|
||||
neighbor = neigh_find( p, &A.gw, 0 );
|
||||
if (!neighbor) {
|
||||
log( L_ERR "%I asked me to route %I/%I using not-neighbor %I.", A.from, b->network, b->netmask, A.gw );
|
||||
|
@ -210,14 +212,23 @@ advertise_entry( struct proto *p, struct rip_block *b, ip_addr whotoldme )
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
A.iface = neighbor->iface;
|
||||
if (!(i = neighbor->data)) {
|
||||
i = neighbor->data = find_interface(p, A.iface);
|
||||
if (!(rif = neighbor->data)) {
|
||||
rif = neighbor->data = find_interface(p, A.iface);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!rif) {
|
||||
bug("Route packet using unknown interface? No.");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* set to: interface of nexthop */
|
||||
a = rta_lookup(&A);
|
||||
n = net_get( &master_table, 0, b->network, ipa_mklen( b->netmask )); /* FIXME: should verify that it really is netmask */
|
||||
if (!ipa_equal( ipa_mkmask(ipa_mklen(b->netmask)), b->netmask)) {
|
||||
log( L_ERR "%I asked me to route %I/%I, but that is not valid netmask.", A.from, b->network, b->netmask );
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
n = net_get( &master_table, 0, b->network, ipa_mklen( b->netmask ));
|
||||
r = rte_get_temp(a);
|
||||
r->u.rip.metric = ntohl(b->metric) + i->metric;
|
||||
r->u.rip.metric = ntohl(b->metric) + rif->metric;
|
||||
if (r->u.rip.metric > P_CF->infinity) r->u.rip.metric = P_CF->infinity;
|
||||
r->u.rip.tag = ntohl(b->tag);
|
||||
r->net = n;
|
||||
|
@ -239,8 +250,6 @@ process_block( struct proto *p, struct rip_block *block, ip_addr whotoldme )
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* FIXME: Check if destination looks valid - ie not net 0 or 127 */
|
||||
|
||||
debug( "block: %I tells me: %I/%I available, metric %d... ", whotoldme, network, block->netmask, metric );
|
||||
|
||||
advertise_entry( p, block, whotoldme );
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue