Added the introduction chapter of progdoc.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3caca73fd9
commit
38cf78a97a
4 changed files with 159 additions and 4 deletions
1
Doc
1
Doc
|
@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
|
|||
D prog-intro.sgml
|
||||
C lib
|
||||
C nest
|
||||
C conf
|
||||
|
|
1
TODO
1
TODO
|
@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ o "About routing tables" by melo byt podstatne podrobnejsi (vysvetlit, co vlast
|
|||
ze lze prenaset routy mezi tabulkami (odkaz na protokol pipe), ze k tabulkam
|
||||
jsou pres filtry pripojeny protokoly atd.) Asi z toho udelat samostatnou kapitolu.
|
||||
o Zminit logy a kategorie hlasek.
|
||||
o Chybi installation requirements: tedy ze potrebujeme GCC a GNU make.
|
||||
|
||||
Filtry:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
151
doc/prog-intro.sgml
Normal file
151
doc/prog-intro.sgml
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
|
|||
<sect>BIRD Design
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1>Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
<p>This document describes the internal workings of the BIRD, its architecture,
|
||||
design decisions and rationale behind them. It also contains documentation on
|
||||
all the essential components of the system and their interfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Routing daemons are very complicated things which need to act in real time
|
||||
to complex sequences external events, react correctly even to the most erroneous behavior
|
||||
of their environment and still handle enormous amount of data with reasonable
|
||||
speed. Due to all of this, their design is very tricky as one needs to carefully
|
||||
balance between efficiency, stability and (last, but not least) simplicity of
|
||||
the program and it would be possible to write literally hundreds of pages about
|
||||
all of these issues. In accordance to the famous quote of Anton Chekhov "Shortness
|
||||
is a sister of talent", we've tried to write a much shorter document highlighting
|
||||
the most important stuff and leaving the boring technical details better explained
|
||||
by the program source itself together with comments contained therein.
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1>Design goals
|
||||
|
||||
<p>When planning the architecture of BIRD, we've taken a close look at the other existing routing
|
||||
daemons and also at some of the operating systems used on dedicated routers, gathered all important
|
||||
features and added lots of new ones to overcome their shortcomings and better match the requirements
|
||||
of routing in today's Internet: IPv6, policy routing, route filtering and so on. From this
|
||||
planning, the following set of design goals has arisen:
|
||||
|
||||
<itemize>
|
||||
|
||||
<item><it>Support all the standard routing protocols and make it easy to add new ones.</it>
|
||||
This leads to modularity and clean separation between the core and the protocols.
|
||||
|
||||
<item><it>Support both IPv4 and IPv6 in the same source tree, re-using most of the code.</it>
|
||||
This leads to abstraction of IP addresses and operations on them.
|
||||
|
||||
<item><it>Minimize OS dependent code to make porting as easy as possible.</it>
|
||||
Unfortunately, such code cannot be avoided at all as the details of communication with
|
||||
the IP stack differ from OS to OS and they often vary even between different
|
||||
versions of the same OS, but we can isolate such code in special modules and
|
||||
do the porting by changing just these modules.
|
||||
Also, don't rely on specific features of various operating systems, but be able
|
||||
to make use of them if they are available.
|
||||
|
||||
<item><it>Allow multiple routing tables.</it>
|
||||
Easily solvable by abstracting out routing tables and the corresponding operations.
|
||||
|
||||
<item><it>Offer powerful route filtering.</it>
|
||||
There already were several attempts to incorporate route filters to a dynamic router,
|
||||
but most of them have used simple sequences of filtering rules which were very inflexible
|
||||
and hard to use for any non-trivial filters. We've decided to employ a simple loop-free
|
||||
programming language having access to all the route attributes and being able to
|
||||
modify the most of them.
|
||||
|
||||
<item><it>Support easy configuration and re-configuration.</it>
|
||||
Most routers use a simple configuration language designed ad hoc with no structure at all
|
||||
and allow online changes of configuration by using their command-line interface, thus
|
||||
any complex re-configurations are hard to achieve without replacing the configuration
|
||||
file and restarting the whole router. We've decided to use a more general approach: to
|
||||
have a configuration defined in a context-free language with blocks and nesting, to
|
||||
perform all configuration changes by editing the configuration file, but to be able
|
||||
to read the new configuration and smoothly adapt to it without disturbing parts of
|
||||
the routing process which are not affected by the change.
|
||||
|
||||
<item><it>Be able to be controlled online.</it>
|
||||
In addition to online reconfiguration, a routing daemon should be able to communicate
|
||||
with the user and with many other programs (primarily scripts used for network maintenance)
|
||||
in order to make it possible to inspect contents of routing tables, status of all
|
||||
routing protocols and also to control their behavior (i.e., it should be possible
|
||||
to disable, enable or reset a protocol without restarting all the others). To achieve
|
||||
this, we implement a simple command-line protocol based on those used by FTP and SMTP
|
||||
(that is textual commands and textual replies accompanied by a numeric code which makes
|
||||
them both readable to a human and easy to recognize in software).
|
||||
|
||||
<item><it>Respond to all protocol events in real time.</it>
|
||||
A typical solution to this problem is to use lots of threads to separate the workings
|
||||
of all the routing protocols and also of the user interface parts and to hope that
|
||||
the scheduler will assign time to them in a fair enough manner. This is surely a good
|
||||
solution, but we have resisted the temptation and preferred to avoid the overhead of threading
|
||||
and the large number of locks involved and preferred a event driven architecture with
|
||||
our own scheduling of events.
|
||||
|
||||
</itemize>
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1>Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The requirements set above have lead to a simple modular architecture containing
|
||||
the following types of modules:
|
||||
|
||||
<descrip>
|
||||
|
||||
<tagp>Core modules</tagp> implement the core functions of BIRD as taking care
|
||||
of routing tables, keeping protocol status, interacting with the user using
|
||||
the Command-Line Interface (to be called CLI in the rest of this document)
|
||||
etc.
|
||||
|
||||
<tagp>Library modules</tagp> form a large set of various library functions
|
||||
implementing several data abstractions, utility functions and also functions
|
||||
which are a part of standard libraries on some systems, but missing on other
|
||||
ones.
|
||||
|
||||
<tagp>Resource management modules</tagp> take care of resources, their allocation
|
||||
and automatic freeing when the module having requested them ceases to exist.
|
||||
|
||||
<tagp>Configuration modules</tagp> are fragments of lexical analyzer,
|
||||
grammar rules and the corresponding snippets of C code. For each group
|
||||
of code modules (core, each protocol, filters) there exist a configuration
|
||||
module taking care of all the related configuration stuff.
|
||||
|
||||
<tagp>Filters</tagp> implement the route filtering language.
|
||||
|
||||
<tagp>Protocol modules</tagp> implement the individual routing protocols.
|
||||
|
||||
<tagp>System-dependent modules</tagp> implement the interface between BIRD
|
||||
and specific operating systems.
|
||||
|
||||
<tagp>The client</tagp> is a simple program providing an easy, though friendly
|
||||
interface to the CLI.
|
||||
|
||||
</descrip>
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1>Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
<p>BIRD has been written in GNU C. We've considered using of C++, but we've
|
||||
preferred the simplicity and straightforward nature of C which gives us fine
|
||||
control over all implementation details and on the other hand enough
|
||||
instruments to build the abstractions we need.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The building process is controlled by a set of Makefiles for GNU Make,
|
||||
intermixed with several Perl and shell scripts.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The initial configuration of the daemon, detection of system features
|
||||
and selection of the right modules to include for the particular OS
|
||||
and the set of protocols the user has chosen is performed by a configure
|
||||
script created using GNU Autoconf.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The parser of the configuration is generated by the GNU Bison.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The documentation is generated using <file/SGMLtools/ with our own DTD
|
||||
and mapping rules. The printed form of the documentation is first converted
|
||||
from SGML to <LaTeX> and then processed by <LaTeX> and <file/dvips/ to
|
||||
produce a PostScript file.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The comments from C sources which form a part of the programmer's
|
||||
documentation are extracted using a modified version of the <file/kernel-doc/
|
||||
tool.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
LocalWords: IPv IP CLI snippets Perl Autoconf SGMLtools DTD SGML dvips
|
||||
LocalWords: PostScript
|
||||
-->
|
10
lib/Doc
10
lib/Doc
|
@ -2,11 +2,13 @@ H Library
|
|||
S checksum.c md5.c
|
||||
S ip.c ipv4.c ipv6.c
|
||||
S lists.c
|
||||
S mempool.c
|
||||
S slab.c
|
||||
S socket.h
|
||||
S bitops.c
|
||||
S event.c
|
||||
S patmatch.c
|
||||
S printf.c
|
||||
S unaligned.h
|
||||
H Resource management
|
||||
S resource.c
|
||||
S mempool.c
|
||||
S slab.c
|
||||
S socket.h
|
||||
S event.c
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue