Doc: Add tag for links to RFCs
This commit is contained in:
parent
9c20a8b7ae
commit
7935b9d212
4 changed files with 118 additions and 133 deletions
238
doc/bird.sgml
238
doc/bird.sgml
|
@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ running on background which does the dynamic part of Internet routing, that is
|
|||
it communicates with the other routers, calculates routing tables and sends them
|
||||
to the OS kernel which does the actual packet forwarding. There already exist
|
||||
other such routing daemons: routed (RIP only), GateD (non-free),
|
||||
Zebra <HTMLURL URL="http://www.zebra.org"> and
|
||||
MRTD <HTMLURL URL="http://sourceforge.net/projects/mrt">,
|
||||
<HTMLURL URL="http://www.zebra.org" name="Zebra"> and
|
||||
<HTMLURL URL="http://sourceforge.net/projects/mrt" name="MRTD">,
|
||||
but their capabilities are limited and they are relatively hard to configure
|
||||
and maintain.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -485,9 +485,9 @@ protocol rip {
|
|||
used to validate route origination of BGP routes. A ROA table contains
|
||||
ROA entries, each consist of a network prefix, a max prefix length and
|
||||
an AS number. A ROA entry specifies prefixes which could be originated
|
||||
by that AS number. ROA tables could be filled with data from RPKI (RFC
|
||||
6480) or from public databases like Whois. ROA tables are examined by
|
||||
<cf/roa_check()/ operator in filters.
|
||||
by that AS number. ROA tables could be filled with data from RPKI (<rfc
|
||||
id="6480">) or from public databases like Whois. ROA tables are
|
||||
examined by <cf/roa_check()/ operator in filters.
|
||||
|
||||
Currently, there is just one option, <cf>roa <m/prefix/ max <m/num/ as
|
||||
<m/num/</cf>, which can be used to populate the ROA table with static
|
||||
|
@ -1270,9 +1270,9 @@ clist) or on clist and pair/quad set (returning true if there is an element of
|
|||
the clist that is also a member of the pair/quad set).
|
||||
|
||||
<p>There is one operator related to ROA infrastructure - <cf/roa_check()/. It
|
||||
examines a ROA table and does RFC 6483 route origin validation for a given
|
||||
network prefix. The basic usage is <cf>roa_check(<m/table/)</cf>, which checks
|
||||
current route (which should be from BGP to have AS_PATH argument) in the
|
||||
examines a ROA table and does <rfc id="6483"> route origin validation for a
|
||||
given network prefix. The basic usage is <cf>roa_check(<m/table/)</cf>, which
|
||||
checks current route (which should be from BGP to have AS_PATH argument) in the
|
||||
specified ROA table and returns ROA_UNKNOWN if there is no relevant ROA,
|
||||
ROA_VALID if there is a matching ROA, or ROA_INVALID if there are some relevant
|
||||
ROAs but none of them match. There is also an extended variant
|
||||
|
@ -1434,11 +1434,12 @@ corresponding protocol sections.
|
|||
<sect1>Introduction
|
||||
<label id="babel-intro">
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The Babel protocol (RFC6126) is a loop-avoiding distance-vector routing
|
||||
protocol that is robust and efficient both in ordinary wired networks and in
|
||||
wireless mesh networks. Babel is conceptually very simple in its operation and
|
||||
"just works" in its default configuration, though some configuration is possible
|
||||
and in some cases desirable.
|
||||
<p>The Babel protocol
|
||||
(<rfc id="6126">) is a loop-avoiding distance-vector routing protocol that is
|
||||
robust and efficient both in ordinary wired networks and in wireless mesh
|
||||
networks. Babel is conceptually very simple in its operation and "just works"
|
||||
in its default configuration, though some configuration is possible and in some
|
||||
cases desirable.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>While the Babel protocol is dual stack (i.e., can carry both IPv4 and IPv6
|
||||
routes over the same IPv6 transport), BIRD presently implements only the IPv6
|
||||
|
@ -1580,14 +1581,10 @@ addresses and associated interfaces. When a session changes its state, these
|
|||
protocols are notified and act accordingly (e.g. break an OSPF adjacency when
|
||||
the BFD session went down).
|
||||
|
||||
<p>BIRD implements basic BFD behavior as defined in
|
||||
RFC 5880<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc5880.txt">
|
||||
(some advanced features like the echo mode or authentication are not implemented),
|
||||
IP transport for BFD as defined in
|
||||
RFC 5881<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc5881.txt"> and
|
||||
RFC 5883<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc5883.txt">
|
||||
and interaction with client protocols as defined in
|
||||
RFC 5882<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc5882.txt">.
|
||||
<p>BIRD implements basic BFD behavior as defined in <rfc id="5880"> (some
|
||||
advanced features like the echo mode or authentication are not implemented), IP
|
||||
transport for BFD as defined in <rfc id="5881"> and <rfc id="5883"> and
|
||||
interaction with client protocols as defined in <rfc id="5882">.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Note that BFD implementation in BIRD is currently a new feature in
|
||||
development, expect some rough edges and possible UI and configuration changes
|
||||
|
@ -1764,31 +1761,16 @@ the packet will travel through if it uses the particular route) in order to
|
|||
avoid routing loops.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>BIRD supports all requirements of the BGP4 standard as defined in
|
||||
RFC 4271<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4271.txt">
|
||||
It also supports the community attributes
|
||||
(RFC 1997<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc1997.txt">),
|
||||
capability negotiation
|
||||
(RFC 5492<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc5492.txt">),
|
||||
MD5 password authentication
|
||||
(RFC 2385<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2385.txt">),
|
||||
extended communities
|
||||
(RFC 4360<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4360.txt">),
|
||||
route reflectors
|
||||
(RFC 4456<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4456.txt">),
|
||||
graceful restart
|
||||
(RFC 4724<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4724.txt">),
|
||||
multiprotocol extensions
|
||||
(RFC 4760<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4760.txt">),
|
||||
4B AS numbers
|
||||
(RFC 4893<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4893.txt">),
|
||||
and 4B AS numbers in extended communities
|
||||
(RFC 5668<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc5668.txt">).
|
||||
<rfc id="4271"> It also supports the community attributes (<rfc id="1997">),
|
||||
capability negotiation (<rfc id="5492">), MD5 password authentication (<rfc
|
||||
id="2385">), extended communities (<rfc id="4360">), route reflectors (<rfc
|
||||
id="4456">), graceful restart (<rfc id="4724">), multiprotocol extensions
|
||||
(<rfc id="4760">), 4B AS numbers (<rfc id="4893">), and 4B AS numbers in
|
||||
extended communities (<rfc id="5668">).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
For IPv6, it uses the standard multiprotocol extensions defined in
|
||||
RFC 4760<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4760.txt">
|
||||
and applied to IPv6 according to
|
||||
RFC 2545<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2545.txt">.
|
||||
<rfc id="4760"> and applied to IPv6 according to <rfc id="2545">.
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1>Route selection rules
|
||||
<label id="bgp-route-select-rules">
|
||||
|
@ -1938,20 +1920,20 @@ using the following configuration parameters:
|
|||
<ref id="bfd" name="BFD"> section for details. Default: disabled.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-ttl-security">ttl security <m/switch/</tag>
|
||||
Use GTSM (RFC 5082 - the generalized TTL security mechanism). GTSM
|
||||
protects against spoofed packets by ignoring doc/bird.sgmlreceived packets with a
|
||||
Use GTSM (<rfc id="5082"> - the generalized TTL security mechanism). GTSM
|
||||
protects against spoofed packets by ignoring received packets with a
|
||||
smaller than expected TTL. To work properly, GTSM have to be enabled on
|
||||
both sides of a BGP session. If both <cf/ttl security/ and <cf/multihop/
|
||||
options are enabled, <cf/multihop/ option should specify proper hop
|
||||
value to compute expected TTL. Kernel support required: Linux: 2.6.34+
|
||||
(IPv4), 2.6.35+ (IPv6), BSD: since long ago, IPv4 only. Note that full
|
||||
(ICMP protection, for example) RFC 5082 support is provided by Linux
|
||||
only. Default: disabled.
|
||||
both sides of a BGP session. If both <cf/ttl security/ and
|
||||
<cf/multihop/ options are enabled, <cf/multihop/ option should specify
|
||||
proper hop value to compute expected TTL. Kernel support required:
|
||||
Linux: 2.6.34+ (IPv4), 2.6.35+ (IPv6), BSD: since long ago, IPv4 only.
|
||||
Note that full (ICMP protection, for example) <rfc id="5082"> support is
|
||||
provided by Linux only. Default: disabled.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-pass">password <m/string/</tag>
|
||||
Use this password for MD5 authentication of BGP sessions (RFC 2385).
|
||||
When used on BSD systems, see also <cf/setkey/ option below. Default:
|
||||
no authentication.
|
||||
Use this password for MD5 authentication of BGP sessions (<rfc id="2385">). When
|
||||
used on BSD systems, see also <cf/setkey/ option below. Default: no
|
||||
authentication.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-setkey">setkey <m/switch/</tag>
|
||||
On BSD systems, keys for TCP MD5 authentication are stored in the global
|
||||
|
@ -1966,7 +1948,7 @@ using the following configuration parameters:
|
|||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-passive">passive <m/switch/</tag>
|
||||
Standard BGP behavior is both initiating outgoing connections and
|
||||
accepting incoming connections. In passive modoc/bird.sgmlde, outgoing connections
|
||||
accepting incoming connections. In passive mode, outgoing connections
|
||||
are not initiated. Default: off.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-rr-client">rr client</tag>
|
||||
|
@ -1985,11 +1967,11 @@ using the following configuration parameters:
|
|||
Be a route server and treat the neighbor as a route server client.
|
||||
A route server is used as a replacement for full mesh EBGP routing in
|
||||
Internet exchange points in a similar way to route reflectors used in
|
||||
IBGP routing. BIRD does not implement obsoleted RFC 1863, but uses
|
||||
ad-hoc implementation, which behaves like plain EBGP but reduces
|
||||
IBGP routing. BIRD does not implement obsoleted <rfc id="1863">, but
|
||||
uses ad-hoc implementation, which behaves like plain EBGP but reduces
|
||||
modifications to advertised route attributes to be transparent (for
|
||||
example does not prepend its AS number to AS PATH attribute and keeps
|
||||
MED attribute). Default: disabled.
|
||||
example does not prepend its AS number to AS PATH attribute and
|
||||
keeps MED attribute). Default: disabled.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-secondary">secondary <m/switch/</tag>
|
||||
Usually, if an export filter rejects a selected route, no other route is
|
||||
|
@ -2023,27 +2005,28 @@ using the following configuration parameters:
|
|||
to keep BGP speakers synchronized. Sometimes (e.g., if BGP speaker
|
||||
changes its import filter, or if there is suspicion of inconsistency) it
|
||||
is necessary to do a new complete route exchange. BGP protocol extension
|
||||
Route Refresh (RFC 2918) allows BGP speaker to request re-advertisement
|
||||
of all routes from its neighbor. BGP protocol extension Enhanced Route
|
||||
Refresh (RFC 7313) specifies explicit begin and end for such exchanges,
|
||||
therefore the receiver can remove stale routes that were not advertised
|
||||
during the exchange. This option specifies whether BIRD advertises these
|
||||
capabilities and supports related procedures. Note that even when
|
||||
disabled, BIRD can send route refresh requests. Default: on.
|
||||
Route Refresh (<rfc id="2918">) allows BGP speaker to request
|
||||
re-advertisement of all routes from its neighbor. BGP protocol
|
||||
extension Enhanced Route Refresh (<rfc id="7313">) specifies explicit
|
||||
begin and end for such exchanges, therefore the receiver can remove
|
||||
stale routes that were not advertised during the exchange. This option
|
||||
specifies whether BIRD advertises these capabilities and supports
|
||||
related procedures. Note that even when disabled, BIRD can send route
|
||||
refresh requests. Default: on.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-graceful-restart">graceful restart <m/switch/|aware</tag>
|
||||
When a BGP speaker restarts or crashes, neighbors will discard all
|
||||
received paths from the speaker, which disrupts packet forwarding even
|
||||
when the forwarding plane of the speaker remains intact. RFC 4724
|
||||
specifies an optional graceful restart mechanism to alleviate this
|
||||
issue. This option controls the mechanism. It has three states:
|
||||
Disabled, when no support is provided. Aware, when the graceful restart
|
||||
support is announced and the support for restarting neighbors is
|
||||
provided, but no local graceful restart is allowed (i.e. receiving-only
|
||||
role). Enabled, when the full graceful restart support is provided
|
||||
(i.e. both restarting and receiving role). Note that proper support for
|
||||
local graceful restart requires also configuration of other protocols.
|
||||
Default: aware.
|
||||
when the forwarding plane of the speaker remains intact. <rfc
|
||||
id="4724"> specifies an optional graceful restart mechanism to
|
||||
alleviate this issue. This option controls the mechanism. It has three
|
||||
states: Disabled, when no support is provided. Aware, when the graceful
|
||||
restart support is announced and the support for restarting neighbors
|
||||
is provided, but no local graceful restart is allowed (i.e.
|
||||
receiving-only role). Enabled, when the full graceful restart
|
||||
support is provided (i.e. both restarting and receiving role). Note
|
||||
that proper support for local graceful restart requires also
|
||||
configuration of other protocols. Default: aware.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-graceful-restart-time">graceful restart time <m/number/</tag>
|
||||
The restart time is announced in the BGP graceful restart capability
|
||||
|
@ -2052,15 +2035,15 @@ using the following configuration parameters:
|
|||
120 seconds.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-interpret-communities">interpret communities <m/switch/</tag>
|
||||
RFC 1997 demands that BGP speaker should process well-known communities
|
||||
like no-export (65535, 65281) or no-advertise (65535, 65282). For
|
||||
example, received route carrying a no-adverise community should not be
|
||||
advertised to any of its neighbors. If this option is enabled (which is
|
||||
by default), BIRD has such behavior automatically (it is evaluated when
|
||||
a route is exported to the BGP protocol just before the export filter).
|
||||
Otherwise, this integrated processing of well-known communities is
|
||||
disabled. In that case, similar behavior can be implemented in the
|
||||
export filter. Default: on.
|
||||
<rfc id="1997"> demands that BGP speaker should process well-known
|
||||
communities like no-export (65535, 65281) or no-advertise (65535,
|
||||
65282). For example, received route carrying a no-adverise community
|
||||
should not be advertised to any of its neighbors. If this option is
|
||||
enabled (which is by default), BIRD has such behavior automatically (it
|
||||
is evaluated when a route is exported to the BGP protocol just before
|
||||
the export filter). Otherwise, this integrated processing of
|
||||
well-known communities is disabled. In that case, similar behavior can
|
||||
be implemented in the export filter. Default: on.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-enable-as4">enable as4 <m/switch/</tag>
|
||||
BGP protocol was designed to use 2B AS numbers and was extended later to
|
||||
|
@ -2085,17 +2068,17 @@ using the following configuration parameters:
|
|||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-advertise-ipv4">advertise ipv4 <m/switch/</tag>
|
||||
Advertise IPv4 multiprotocol capability. This is not a correct behavior
|
||||
according to the strict interpretation of RFC 4760, but it is widespread
|
||||
and required by some BGP implementations (Cisco and Quagga). This option
|
||||
is relevant to IPv4 mode with enabled capability advertisement
|
||||
only. Default: on.
|
||||
according to the strict interpretation of <rfc id="4760">, but it is
|
||||
widespread and required by some BGP implementations (Cisco and Quagga).
|
||||
This option is relevant to IPv4 mode with enabled capability
|
||||
advertisement only. Default: on.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-route-limit">route limit <m/number/</tag>
|
||||
The maximal number of routes that may be imported from the protocol. If
|
||||
the route limit is exceeded, the connection is closed with an error.
|
||||
Limit is currently implemented as <cf>import limit <m/number/ action
|
||||
restart</cf>. This option is obsolete and it is replaced by
|
||||
<ref id="proto-import-limit" name="import limit option">. Default: no limit.
|
||||
<ref id="proto-import-limit" name="import limit option">. Default: no limit.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-disable-after-error">disable after error <m/switch/</tag>
|
||||
When an error is encountered (either locally or by the other side),
|
||||
|
@ -2152,16 +2135,16 @@ using the following configuration parameters:
|
|||
BGP route selection algorithm is often viewed as a comparison between
|
||||
individual routes (e.g. if a new route appears and is better than the
|
||||
current best one, it is chosen as the new best one). But the proper
|
||||
route selection, as specified by RFC 4271, cannot be fully implemented
|
||||
in that way. The problem is mainly in handling the MED attribute. BIRD,
|
||||
by default, uses an simplification based on individual route comparison,
|
||||
which in some cases may lead to temporally dependent behavior (i.e. the
|
||||
selection is dependent on the order in which routes appeared). This
|
||||
option enables a different (and slower) algorithm implementing proper
|
||||
RFC 4271 route selection, which is deterministic. Alternative way how to
|
||||
get deterministic behavior is to use <cf/med metric/ option. This option
|
||||
is incompatible with <ref id="dsc-table-sorted" name="sorted tables">.
|
||||
Default: off.
|
||||
route selection, as specified by <rfc id="4271">, cannot be fully
|
||||
implemented in that way. The problem is mainly in handling the MED
|
||||
attribute. BIRD, by default, uses an simplification based on individual
|
||||
route comparison, which in some cases may lead to temporally dependent
|
||||
behavior (i.e. the selection is dependent on the order in which routes
|
||||
appeared). This option enables a different (and slower) algorithm
|
||||
implementing proper <rfc id="4271"> route selection, which is
|
||||
deterministic. Alternative way how to get deterministic behavior is to
|
||||
use <cf/med metric/ option. This option is incompatible with <ref
|
||||
id="dsc-table-sorted" name="sorted tables">. Default: off.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-igp-metric">igp metric <m/switch/</tag>
|
||||
Enable comparison of internal distances to boundary routers during best
|
||||
|
@ -2170,7 +2153,7 @@ using the following configuration parameters:
|
|||
<tag><label id="bgp-prefer-older">prefer older <m/switch/</tag>
|
||||
Standard route selection algorithm breaks ties by comparing router IDs.
|
||||
This changes the behavior to prefer older routes (when both are external
|
||||
and from different peer). For details, see RFC 5004. Default: off.
|
||||
and from different peer). For details, see <rfc id="5004">. Default: off.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="bgp-default-med">default bgp_med <m/number/</tag>
|
||||
Value of the Multiple Exit Discriminator to be used during route
|
||||
|
@ -2210,8 +2193,8 @@ some of them (marked with `<tt/O/') are optional.
|
|||
when a route is exported to an external BGP instance to ensure that the
|
||||
attribute received from a neighboring AS is not propagated to other
|
||||
neighboring ASes. A new value might be set in the export filter of an
|
||||
external BGP instance. See RFC 4451<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4451.txt">
|
||||
for further discussion of BGP MED attribute.
|
||||
external BGP instance. See <rfc id="4451"> for further discussion of
|
||||
BGP MED attribute.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="rta-bgp-origin">enum bgp_origin/</tag>
|
||||
Origin of the route: either <cf/ORIGIN_IGP/ if the route has originated
|
||||
|
@ -2580,15 +2563,13 @@ protocol kernel { # Secondary routing table
|
|||
<label id="ospf-intro">
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) is a quite complex interior gateway
|
||||
protocol. The current IPv4 version (OSPFv2) is defined in RFC 2328
|
||||
<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2328.txt">
|
||||
and the current IPv6 version (OSPFv3) is defined in RFC 5340
|
||||
<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc5340.txt">
|
||||
It's a link state (a.k.a. shortest path first) protocol -- each router maintains
|
||||
a database describing the autonomous system's topology. Each participating
|
||||
router has an identical copy of the database and all routers run the same
|
||||
algorithm calculating a shortest path tree with themselves as a root. OSPF
|
||||
chooses the least cost path as the best path.
|
||||
protocol. The current IPv4 version (OSPFv2) is defined in <rfc id="2328"> and
|
||||
the current IPv6 version (OSPFv3) is defined in <rfc id="5340"> It's a link
|
||||
state (a.k.a. shortest path first) protocol -- each router maintains a database
|
||||
describing the autonomous system's topology. Each participating router has an
|
||||
identical copy of the database and all routers run the same algorithm
|
||||
calculating a shortest path tree with themselves as a root. OSPF chooses the
|
||||
least cost path as the best path.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>In OSPF, the autonomous system can be split to several areas in order to
|
||||
reduce the amount of resources consumed for exchanging the routing information
|
||||
|
@ -2708,8 +2689,7 @@ protocol ospf <name> {
|
|||
<descrip>
|
||||
<tag><label id="ospf-rfc1583compat">rfc1583compat <M>switch</M></tag>
|
||||
This option controls compatibility of routing table calculation with
|
||||
RFC 1583 <htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc1583.txt">.
|
||||
Default value is no.
|
||||
<rfc id="1583">. Default value is no.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="ospf-instance-id">instance id <m/num/</tag>
|
||||
When multiple OSPF protocol instances are active on the same links, they
|
||||
|
@ -2726,9 +2706,8 @@ protocol ospf <name> {
|
|||
that participates in the OSPF topology but does not allow transit
|
||||
traffic. In OSPFv2, this is implemented by advertising maximum metric
|
||||
for outgoing links. In OSPFv3, the stub router behavior is announced by
|
||||
clearing the R-bit in the router LSA. See RFC 6987
|
||||
<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc6987.txt"> for
|
||||
details. Default value is no.
|
||||
clearing the R-bit in the router LSA. See <rfc id="6987"> for details.
|
||||
Default value is no.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="ospf-tick">tick <M>num</M></tag>
|
||||
The routing table calculation and clean-up of areas' databases is not
|
||||
|
@ -2839,10 +2818,9 @@ protocol ospf <name> {
|
|||
|
||||
You can specify alternative instance ID for the interface definition,
|
||||
therefore it is possible to have several instances of that interface
|
||||
with different options or even in different areas. For OSPFv2,
|
||||
instance ID support is an extension (RFC 6549
|
||||
<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc6549.txt">) and is
|
||||
supposed to be set per-protocol. For OSPFv3, it is an integral feature.
|
||||
with different options or even in different areas. For OSPFv2, instance
|
||||
ID support is an extension (<rfc id="6549">) and is supposed to be set
|
||||
per-protocol. For OSPFv3, it is an integral feature.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="ospf-virtual-link">virtual link <M>id</M> [instance <m/num/]</tag>
|
||||
Virtual link to router with the router id. Virtual link acts as a
|
||||
|
@ -3266,9 +3244,7 @@ time intervals or as an answer to a request) advertisement packets to connected
|
|||
networks. These packets contain basic information about a local network (e.g. a
|
||||
list of network prefixes), which allows network hosts to autoconfigure network
|
||||
addresses and choose a default route. BIRD implements router behavior as defined
|
||||
in RFC 4861<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4861.txt">
|
||||
and also the DNS extensions from
|
||||
RFC 6106<htmlurl url="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc6106.txt">.
|
||||
in <rfc id="4861"> and also the DNS extensions from <rfc id="6106">.
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1>Configuration
|
||||
<label id="radv-config">
|
||||
|
@ -3523,12 +3499,9 @@ counting to infinity is necessary, because it is slow. Due to infinity being 16,
|
|||
you can't use RIP on networks where maximal distance is higher than 15
|
||||
hosts.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>BIRD supports RIPv1
|
||||
(RFC 1058<htmlurl url="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1058.txt">),
|
||||
RIPv2 (RFC 2453<htmlurl url="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2453.txt">),
|
||||
RIPng (RFC 2080<htmlurl url="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2080.txt">),
|
||||
and RIP cryptographic authentication (SHA-1 not implemented)
|
||||
(RFC 4822<htmlurl url="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4822.txt">).
|
||||
<p>BIRD supports RIPv1 (<rfc id="1058">), RIPv2 (<rfc id="2453">), RIPng (<rfc
|
||||
id="2080">), and RIP cryptographic authentication (SHA-1 not implemented)
|
||||
(<rfc id="4822">).
|
||||
|
||||
<p>RIP is a very simple protocol, and it has a lot of shortcomings. Slow
|
||||
convergence, big network load and inability to handle larger networks makes it
|
||||
|
@ -3707,8 +3680,9 @@ protocol rip [<name>] {
|
|||
compatibility with neighbors regardless of whether they use ttl
|
||||
security.
|
||||
|
||||
For RIPng, TTL security is a standard behavior (required by RFC 2080)
|
||||
and therefore default value is yes. For IPv4 RIP, default value is no.
|
||||
For RIPng, TTL security is a standard behavior (required by <rfc
|
||||
id="2080">) and therefore default value is yes. For IPv4 RIP, default
|
||||
value is no.
|
||||
|
||||
<tag><label id="rip-iface-tx-class">tx class|dscp|priority <m/number/</tag>
|
||||
These options specify the ToS/DiffServ/Traffic class/Priority of the
|
||||
|
|
4
doc/sbase/dist/birddoc/html/mapping
vendored
4
doc/sbase/dist/birddoc/html/mapping
vendored
|
@ -205,6 +205,10 @@
|
|||
<htmlurl> "<A HREF=\"[URL]\">[NAME]</A>"
|
||||
</htmlurl>
|
||||
|
||||
<rfc> "<A HREF=\"http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc[ID]\">RFC [ID]</A>"
|
||||
</rfc>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% ref modified to have an optional name field
|
||||
<ref> + "<@@ref>[ID]\n"
|
||||
"[NAME]</A>\n"
|
||||
|
|
3
doc/sbase/dist/birddoc/latex2e/mapping
vendored
3
doc/sbase/dist/birddoc/latex2e/mapping
vendored
|
@ -238,6 +238,9 @@
|
|||
<htmlurl> "\\href{[URL]}{[NAME]}"
|
||||
</htmlurl>
|
||||
|
||||
<rfc> "\\href{http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc[ID]}{RFC [ID]}"
|
||||
</rfc>
|
||||
|
||||
<x>
|
||||
</x>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ anywhere else. <pavel@ucw.cz>
|
|||
|
||||
<!-- url added by HG; htmlurl added by esr -->
|
||||
<!entity % xref
|
||||
" label|ref|pageref|cite|url|htmlurl|ncite " >
|
||||
" label|ref|pageref|cite|url|htmlurl|rfc|ncite " >
|
||||
|
||||
<!entity % inline
|
||||
" (#pcdata | f| x| %emph; |sq| %xref | %index | file )* " >
|
||||
|
@ -501,6 +501,10 @@ anywhere else. <pavel@ucw.cz>
|
|||
url cdata #required
|
||||
name cdata "&urlnam" >
|
||||
|
||||
<!element rfc - o empty>
|
||||
<!attlist rfc
|
||||
id cdata #required>
|
||||
|
||||
<!element pageref - o empty>
|
||||
<!attlist pageref
|
||||
id cdata #required>
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue