Bugfix - count courrectly next hop on single hop virtual link.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6eb4b73fe8
commit
7de7470a2a
1 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions
|
@ -117,13 +117,13 @@ ri_install(struct proto_ospf *po, ip_addr prefix, int pxlen, int dest,
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
memcpy(&old->n, new, sizeof(orta));
|
memcpy(&old->n, new, sizeof(orta));
|
||||||
old->efn = ipath;
|
old->efn = ipath;
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
if ((new->type == RTS_OSPF) && (anet = (struct area_net *)fib_route(&oa->net_fib, prefix, pxlen)))
|
if ((new->type == RTS_OSPF) && (anet = (struct area_net *)fib_route(&oa->net_fib, prefix, pxlen)))
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
anet->active = 1;
|
anet->active = 1;
|
||||||
if (new->metric1 > anet->metric) anet->metric = new->metric1;
|
if (new->metric1 > anet->metric) anet->metric = new->metric1;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
old = (ort *) fib_get(&oa->rtr, &prefix, pxlen);
|
old = (ort *) fib_get(&oa->rtr, &prefix, pxlen);
|
||||||
|
@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ calc_next_hop(struct top_hash_entry *en, struct top_hash_entry *par,
|
||||||
if ((neigh = find_neigh_noifa(po, en->lsa.rt)) == NULL)
|
if ((neigh = find_neigh_noifa(po, en->lsa.rt)) == NULL)
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
en->nhi = neigh->ifa;
|
en->nhi = neigh->ifa;
|
||||||
if (neigh->ifa->type == OSPF_IT_VLINK)
|
if (ipa_equal(en->nh, IPA_NONE))
|
||||||
en->nh = neigh->ip; /* Yes, neighbor is it's
|
en->nh = neigh->ip; /* Yes, neighbor is it's
|
||||||
* own next hop */
|
* own next hop */
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
|
@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ calc_next_hop(struct top_hash_entry *en, struct top_hash_entry *par,
|
||||||
{ /* Parent is some RT neighbor */
|
{ /* Parent is some RT neighbor */
|
||||||
log(L_ERR "Router's parent has no next hop. (EN=%I, PAR=%I)",
|
log(L_ERR "Router's parent has no next hop. (EN=%I, PAR=%I)",
|
||||||
en->lsa.id, par->lsa.id);
|
en->lsa.id, par->lsa.id);
|
||||||
/* I hoped this would never happen */
|
/* I hope this would never happen */
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -961,20 +961,18 @@ again1:
|
||||||
if (nf->n.ifa) a0.iface = nf->n.ifa->iface;
|
if (nf->n.ifa) a0.iface = nf->n.ifa->iface;
|
||||||
a0.gw = nf->n.nh;
|
a0.gw = nf->n.nh;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (ipa_equal(nf->n.nh, IPA_NONE)) a0.dest = RTD_DEVICE;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ((!ipa_equal(nf->n.nh, IPA_NONE)) && (!neigh_find(p, &nf->n.nh, 0)))
|
if ((!ipa_equal(nf->n.nh, IPA_NONE)) && (!neigh_find(p, &nf->n.nh, 0)))
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int found = 0;
|
int found = 0;
|
||||||
struct ospf_iface *ifa;
|
struct ospf_iface *ifa;
|
||||||
struct top_hash_entry *en;
|
struct top_hash_entry *en;
|
||||||
DBG("Trying to find correct next hop");
|
OSPF_TRACE(D_EVENTS, "Trying to find correct next hop");
|
||||||
WALK_LIST(ifa, po->iface_list)
|
WALK_LIST(ifa, po->iface_list)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
if ((ifa->type == OSPF_IT_VLINK) && ipa_equal(ifa->vip, nf->n.nh))
|
if ((ifa->type == OSPF_IT_VLINK) && ipa_equal(ifa->vip, nf->n.nh))
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
if ((en = ospf_hash_find(po->gr, ifa->voa->areaid, ifa->vid, ifa->vid, LSA_T_RT)) &&
|
if ((en = ospf_hash_find(po->gr, ifa->voa->areaid, ifa->vid, ifa->vid, LSA_T_RT))
|
||||||
(!ipa_equal(en->nh, IPA_NONE)))
|
&& (!ipa_equal(en->nh, IPA_NONE)))
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
a0.gw = en->nh;
|
a0.gw = en->nh;
|
||||||
found = 1;
|
found = 1;
|
||||||
|
@ -985,6 +983,8 @@ again1:
|
||||||
if (!found) nf->n.metric1 = LSINFINITY; /* Delete it */
|
if (!found) nf->n.metric1 = LSINFINITY; /* Delete it */
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (ipa_equal(nf->n.nh, IPA_NONE)) a0.dest = RTD_DEVICE;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!a0.iface) /* Still no match? Can this really happen? */
|
if (!a0.iface) /* Still no match? Can this really happen? */
|
||||||
nf->n.metric1 = LSINFINITY;
|
nf->n.metric1 = LSINFINITY;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue