Use AF_UNSPEC for RTM_GETLINK
This value is specified in documentation.
This commit is contained in:
parent
2bbc308321
commit
86c3eea0f3
1 changed files with 5 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ nl_send(struct nl_sock *nl, struct nlmsghdr *nh)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
nl_request_dump(int cmd)
|
||||
nl_request_dump(int af, int cmd)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct {
|
||||
struct nlmsghdr nh;
|
||||
|
@ -104,9 +104,7 @@ nl_request_dump(int cmd)
|
|||
req.nh.nlmsg_type = cmd;
|
||||
req.nh.nlmsg_len = sizeof(req);
|
||||
req.nh.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_DUMP;
|
||||
/* Is it important which AF_* is used for link-level interface scan?
|
||||
It seems that some information is available only when AF_INET is used. */
|
||||
req.g.rtgen_family = (cmd == RTM_GETLINK) ? AF_INET : BIRD_AF;
|
||||
req.g.rtgen_family = af;
|
||||
nl_send(&nl_scan, &req.nh);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -563,14 +561,14 @@ kif_do_scan(struct kif_proto *p UNUSED)
|
|||
|
||||
if_start_update();
|
||||
|
||||
nl_request_dump(RTM_GETLINK);
|
||||
nl_request_dump(AF_UNSPEC, RTM_GETLINK);
|
||||
while (h = nl_get_scan())
|
||||
if (h->nlmsg_type == RTM_NEWLINK || h->nlmsg_type == RTM_DELLINK)
|
||||
nl_parse_link(h, 1);
|
||||
else
|
||||
log(L_DEBUG "nl_scan_ifaces: Unknown packet received (type=%d)", h->nlmsg_type);
|
||||
|
||||
nl_request_dump(RTM_GETADDR);
|
||||
nl_request_dump(BIRD_AF, RTM_GETADDR);
|
||||
while (h = nl_get_scan())
|
||||
if (h->nlmsg_type == RTM_NEWADDR || h->nlmsg_type == RTM_DELADDR)
|
||||
nl_parse_addr(h, 1);
|
||||
|
@ -942,7 +940,7 @@ krt_do_scan(struct krt_proto *p UNUSED) /* CONFIG_ALL_TABLES_AT_ONCE => p is NUL
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct nlmsghdr *h;
|
||||
|
||||
nl_request_dump(RTM_GETROUTE);
|
||||
nl_request_dump(BIRD_AF, RTM_GETROUTE);
|
||||
while (h = nl_get_scan())
|
||||
if (h->nlmsg_type == RTM_NEWROUTE || h->nlmsg_type == RTM_DELROUTE)
|
||||
nl_parse_route(h, 1);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue