From 9807690b413f3a1d29d064761cc99ed5261cfb58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ondrej Zajicek Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 22:05:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fixes link-back check. --- proto/ospf/rt.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/proto/ospf/rt.c b/proto/ospf/rt.c index bd193643..dde6dcd5 100644 --- a/proto/ospf/rt.c +++ b/proto/ospf/rt.c @@ -439,24 +439,26 @@ ospf_rt_spfa(struct ospf_area *oa) } } -#if 0 static int -link_back(struct ospf_area *oa, struct top_hash_entry *fol, struct top_hash_entry *pre) +link_back(struct ospf_area *oa, struct top_hash_entry *en, struct top_hash_entry *par) { u32 i, *rts; struct ospf_lsa_net *ln; struct ospf_lsa_rt *rt; struct ospf_lsa_rt_link *rtl, *rr; + struct top_hash_entry *tmp; struct proto_ospf *po = oa->po; - if (!pre) return 0; - if (!fol) return 0; - switch (fol->lsa.type) + if (!en || !par) return 0; + + // FIXME lb should be properly set for vlinks */ + en->lb = IPA_NONE; + switch (en->lsa.type) { case LSA_T_RT: - rt = (struct ospf_lsa_rt *) fol->lsa_body; + rt = (struct ospf_lsa_rt *) en->lsa_body; rr = (struct ospf_lsa_rt_link *) (rt + 1); - for (i = 0; i < lsa_rt_count(&fol->lsa); i++) + for (i = 0; i < lsa_rt_count(&en->lsa); i++) { rtl = (rr + i); switch (rtl->type) @@ -464,43 +466,44 @@ link_back(struct ospf_area *oa, struct top_hash_entry *fol, struct top_hash_entr case LSART_STUB: break; case LSART_NET: - if (ospf_hash_find(po->gr, oa->areaid, rtl->id, rtl->id, LSA_T_NET) == pre) - { - fol->lb = ipa_from_u32(rtl->data); +#ifdef OSPFv2 + /* In OSPFv2, rtl->id is IP addres of DR, Router ID is not known */ + tmp = ospf_hash_find_net(po->gr, oa->areaid, rtl->id); +#else /* OSPFv3 */ + tmp = ospf_hash_find(po->gr, oa->areaid, rtl->nif, rtl->id, LSA_T_NET); +#endif + if (tmp == par) return 1; - } + break; case LSART_VLNK: case LSART_PTP: - if (ospf_hash_find(po->gr, oa->areaid, rtl->id, rtl->id, LSA_T_RT) == pre) - { - fol->lb = ipa_from_u32(rtl->data); + tmp = ospf_hash_find_rt(po->gr, oa->areaid, rtl->id); + if (tmp == par) return 1; - } + break; default: - log("Unknown link type in router lsa. (rid = %R)", fol->lsa.id); + log(L_WARN "Unknown link type in router lsa. (rid = %R)", en->lsa.rt); break; } } break; case LSA_T_NET: - ln = fol->lsa_body; + ln = en->lsa_body; rts = (u32 *) (ln + 1); - for (i = 0; i < lsa_net_count(&fol->lsa); i++) + for (i = 0; i < lsa_net_count(&en->lsa); i++) { - if (ospf_hash_find(po->gr, oa->areaid, *(rts + i), *(rts + i), LSA_T_RT) == pre) - { + tmp = ospf_hash_find_rt(po->gr, oa->areaid, rts[i]); + if (tmp == par) return 1; - } } break; default: - bug("Unknown lsa type. (id = %R)", fol->lsa.id); + bug("Unknown lsa type %x.", en->lsa.type); } return 0; } -#endif static void ospf_rt_sum_tr(struct ospf_area *oa) @@ -986,13 +989,9 @@ add_cand(list * l, struct top_hash_entry *en, struct top_hash_entry *par, * next hops. I'll start as soon as nest will */ - /* FIXME - fix link_back() - * NOTE - we should not change link_back when - * it is already computed with different way and calc_next_hop() - * for current would fail + /* We should check whether there is a reverse link from en to par, */ if (!link_back(oa, en, par)) return; - */ if (!calc_next_hop(oa, en, par)) {