Hotfix for router's parent without nexthop.

It will probably work perfect, but I need to eliminate such situation.
This commit is contained in:
Ondrej Filip 2004-06-02 09:14:03 +00:00
parent f9625e9aca
commit 9b13345889

View file

@ -554,9 +554,12 @@ add_cand(list *l, struct top_hash_entry *en, struct top_hash_entry *par,
DBG(" Adding candidate: rt: %I, id: %I, type: %u\n",en->lsa.rt,en->lsa.id,en->lsa.type);
en->nhi=NULL;
en->nh=IPA_NONE;
calc_next_hop(en, par, oa);
if(!en->nhi) return; /* We cannot find next hop, ignore it */
if(en->color==CANDIDATE) /* We found a shorter path */
{
rem_node(&en->cn);
@ -624,7 +627,9 @@ calc_next_hop(struct top_hash_entry *en, struct top_hash_entry *par,
en->nhi=ifa->iface;
return;
}
bug("I didn't find interface for my self originated LSA!\n");
log(L_ERR "I didn't find interface for my self originated LSA!\n");
/* This could sometimes happen */
return;
}
else
{
@ -655,7 +660,9 @@ calc_next_hop(struct top_hash_entry *en, struct top_hash_entry *par,
}
else /* Parent is some RT neighbor */
{
bug("Router parent does not have next hop."); /* Hope this will never happen */
log(L_ERR "Router's parent has no next hop. (EN=%I, PAR=%I)", en->lsa.id, par->lsa.id);
/* I hoped this would never happen */
return;
}
}
en->nh=par->nh;