78e4a123bb
The RFC 5575 does not explicitly reject flowspec rules without dst part, it just requires dst part in validation procedure for feasibility, which we do not implement anyway. Thus flow without dst prefix is syntactically valid, but unfeasible (if feasibilty testing is done). Thanks to Alex D. for the bugreport. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
babel | ||
bfd | ||
bgp | ||
mrt | ||
ospf | ||
perf | ||
pipe | ||
radv | ||
rip | ||
rpki | ||
static | ||
Doc |